AEA is committed to the development and adoption of evaluation policies in program development that ensure the sound, context-sensitive use of evaluation and engagement of evaluators. Efforts of AEA’s Policy Initiative, which includes the Evaluation Policy Task Force (EPTF) and Evaluation Policy Topical Interest Group (TIG), are focused specifically on evaluation policies.
Examples of areas of concern around evaluation policy include:
Evaluation definition. How, if at all, is evaluation defined in an agency or legislation? In such contexts, how is evaluation formally distinguished from or related to other functions such as program planning, monitoring, performance measurement, or implementation?
Requirements of evaluation. When are evaluations required? What programs or entities are required to have evaluations? How often are evaluations scheduled? What procedures are used to determine when or whether evaluation takes place?
Evaluation methods. What approaches or methods of evaluation are recommended or required by legislation or regulation, for what types of programs or initiatives?
Human resources regarding evaluation. What requirements exist for people who conduct evaluations? What types of training, experience, or background are required?
Evaluation budgets. What are the standards for budgeting for evaluation work?
Evaluation implementation. What types of evaluation implementation issues are guided by policies? For instance, when are internal versus external evaluations required, and how are these defined?
Evaluation ethics. What are the policies for addressing ethical issues in evaluation?
Through the Evaluation Policy Task Force and Evaluation Policy TIG, AEA brings together researchers, evaluators, policy writers, and organizational leaders for meaningful dialogue around the need for and impact of evaluation policies. Through our advocacy efforts, we seek to improve government programs and their societal impact through evaluation and data best practices. AEA developed “An Evaluation Roadmap for a More Effective Government” as a guide to build capacity for strengthening the practice of evaluation in the federal government.