Date: Friday, January 3, 2025
Hello, AEA365 community! Liz DiLuzio here, Lead Curator of the blog. This week is Individuals Week, which means we take a break from our themed weeks and spotlight the Hot Tips, Cool Tricks, Rad Resources and Lessons Learned from any evaluator interested in sharing. Would you like to contribute to future individuals weeks? Email me at AEA365@eval.org with an idea or a draft and we will make it happen.
We are Amanda Robinson (Senior Research and Evaluation Project Manager) and Nubia Goodwin (Research & Evaluation Project Manager) of the Institute for Community Health (ICH). ICH is a nonprofit consulting organization with close to 25 years of expertise in equitable and participatory evaluation and research. Our organization works on various projects that involve Evaluation Advisory Committees (EACs), made up of community members or grantees engaged by the project, who help inform our evaluation design, implementation, analysis, and reporting. We have found that working with an EAC plays a critical role in our evaluation process and gives us the opportunity to incorporate the needs and perspectives of those on the ground, which helps ensure that our evaluation produces the best possible information in an equitable way.
Through our experience working with EACs, we learned a few key pieces of information:
We learned a lot about strategies to ensure effective EAC functioning, and wanted to share the following tips.
For more information on building effective evaluation advisory committees, check out the following resources:
Do you have questions, concerns, kudos, or content to extend this aea365 contribution? Please add them in the comments section for this post on the aea365 webpage so that we may enrich our community of practice. Would you like to submit an aea365 Tip? Please send a note of interest to aea365@eval.org . aea365 is sponsored by the American Evaluation Association and provides a Tip-a-Day by and for evaluators. The views and opinions expressed on the AEA365 blog are solely those of the original authors and other contributors. These views and opinions do not necessarily represent those of the American Evaluation Association, and/or any/all contributors to this site.